QoE-Oriented Intelligent Resource Scheduling in Immersive XR Services over 5G Network Slices

Authors

  • Darren Neal Department of Computer Science, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA. Author
  • Kasper Lane Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA. Author
  • Suraj Dutta Department of Computer Science, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA. Author

Keywords:

Quality of Experience; Immersive Extended Reality; 5G network slicing; intelligent resource scheduling; deep reinforcement learning; edge computing; multi-tenancy; fairness

Abstract

The convergence of fifth-generation mobile networks and immersive extended reality applications introduces stringent demands for ultra-reliable, low-latency, and high-throughput connectivity, all of which must be satisfied within highly dynamic and multi-tenant network environments. Network slicing has emerged as a foundational enabler of differentiated service provisioning, yet conventional slice management schemes are predominantly oriented toward network-centric quality-of-service metrics and therefore fail to capture the perceptual, context-sensitive dimensions of human quality of experience. This paper presents a system-level examination of quality-of-experience-oriented intelligent resource scheduling for immersive extended reality services delivered over 5G network slices. The study is structured around a holistic architectural framework that integrates perceptual QoE modeling, slice-aware orchestration, closed-loop intelligent decision-making using deep reinforcement learning, and multi-tenant governance mechanisms. The analysis emphasizes structural trade-offs among granularity of resource control, control loop latency, fairness across vertical service providers, energy sustainability, and operational resilience. By examining the interplay among these dimensions, the paper highlights how QoE-centric metrics can be embedded into slice resource schedulers without sacrificing network efficiency or violating service-level agreements. Deployment considerations are discussed across edge-cloud continuums, and the paper further addresses policy, regulatory, and socio-technical implications, including algorithmic transparency, data privacy, and accountability in autonomous resource management. The discussion is cast in continuous academic prose that synthesizes insights from architectural systems research, network softwarization, machine learning for resource allocation, and communication policy studies. The result is a comprehensive forward-looking perspective that positions QoE-aware slice scheduling as a critical integration point where technical innovation, governance frameworks, and human-centric design principles must co-evolve.

References

1. 3GPP. (2018). Study on management and orchestration of network slicing for next generation network (3GPP TR 28.801 v15.1.0). 3rd Generation Partnership Project.

2. Foukas, X., Patounas, G., Elmokashfi, A., & Marina, M. K. (2017). Network slicing in 5G: Survey and challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(5), 94-100.

3. Elbamby, M. S., Perfecto, C., Bennis, M., & Doppler, K. (2018). Toward low-latency and ultra-reliable virtual reality. IEEE Network, 32(2), 78-84.

4. ITU-T. (2018). Subjective evaluation methods for virtual reality services (Recommendation P.809). International Telecommunication Union.

5. Wang, H., Wu, Y., Min, G., & Miao, W. (2019). Deep reinforcement learning based resource allocation for 5G network slicing. IEEE Access, 7, 58899-58907.

6. Chien, H. T., Lin, Y. D., Lai, C. L., & Wang, C. T. (2020). End-to-end network slicing with machine learning for 5G and beyond. IEEE Network, 34(6), 48-54.

7. Caballero, P., Banchs, A., de Veciana, G., Costa-Perez, X., & Azcorra, A. (2018). Network slicing for guaranteed rate services: Admission control and resource allocation games. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 17(10), 6419-6432.

8. Chen, M., Saad, W., & Yin, C. (2018). Virtual reality over wireless networks: Quality-of-service model and learning-based resource management. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 66(11), 5621-5635.

9. Tsiropoulou, E. E., VamvakasP., & Papavassiliou, S. (2020). A green and cost-effective resource allocation and power management framework for 5G network slicing. IEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking, 4(2), 514-527.

10. 3GPP. (2019). System architecture for the 5G System; Stage 2 (3GPP TS 23.501 v16.2.0). 3rd Generation Partnership Project.

11. Saad, W., Bennis, M., & Chen, M. (2020). A vision of 6G wireless systems: Applications, trends, technologies, and open research problems. IEEE Network, 34(3), 134-142.

12. Li, Q. (2026). QoS Assurance Mechanism for 5G Network Slicing Based on the Deep Reinforcement Learning PPO Algorithm. arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.03345.

13. Marquez, C., Gramaglia, M., Fiore, M., Banchs, A., & Costa-Perez, X. (2019). Resource sharing efficiency in network slicing. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 16(2), 632-646.

14. Xu, J., Chen, L., & Ren, S. (2020). Deep reinforcement learning for intelligent network slicing in 5G. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 17(2), 1129-1142.

15. Wang, C., Liang, C., Yu, F. R., Chen, Q., & Tang, L. (2017). Computation offloading and resource allocation in wireless cellular networks with mobile edge computing. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 16(8), 4924-4938.

16. Duan, L., Liu, J., Chen, Z., & Xu, Y. (2019). Subjective and objective quality assessment for omnidirectional video. IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, 66(2), 482-494.

17. Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., & Zemel, R. (2012). Fairness through awareness. In Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (pp. 214-226). ACM.

18. Andrae, A. S. G., & Edler, T. (2015). On global electricity usage of communication technology: Trends to 2030. Challenges, 6(1), 117-157.

19. Parcu, P. L., & Innesti, S. (2021). Regulatory issues for 5G and beyond: A policy perspective. Telecommunications Policy, 45(1), 102072.

20. Afolabi, I., Taleb, T., Samdanis, K., Ksentini, A., & Flinck, H. (2018). Network slicing and softwarization: A survey on principles, enabling technologies, and solutions. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 20(3), 2429-2453.

21. Cunha, V. A., da Silva, E., de Carvalho, M. B., Corujo, D., Barraca, J. P., & Aguiar, R. L. (2020). Security for 5G network slicing: A survey. IEEE Access, 8, 93342-93365.

22. Samdanis, K., Costa-Perez, X., & Sciancalepore, V. (2016). From network sharing to multi-tenancy: The 5G network slice broker. IEEE Communications Magazine, 54(7), 32-39.

23. 3GPP. (2020). Management and orchestration; Concepts, use cases and requirements (3GPP TS 28.530 v16.3.0). 3rd Generation Partnership Project.

24. Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 1-35.

25. Nguyen, D. C., Ding, M., Pathirana, P. N., Seneviratne, A., Li, J., & Poor, H. V. (2021). Federated learning for internet of things: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 23(3), 1622-1658.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-01

How to Cite

QoE-Oriented Intelligent Resource Scheduling in Immersive XR Services over 5G Network Slices. (2026). Journal of Data Intelligence and AI Systems, 1(1). https://www.jdataai.org/index.php/home/article/view/99