Secure Federated Generative AI for Distributed Medical Image Synthesis and Diagnosis
Keywords:
federated learning, generative adversarial networks, medical image synthesis, privacy-preserving AI, distributed diagnosis, differential privacy, healthcare governance, algorithmic fairnessAbstract
The convergence of generative artificial intelligence and federated learning presents a transformative paradigm for distributed medical image synthesis and diagnosis, yet it raises profound challenges in security, governance, and operational sustainability. This paper examines the architectural, infrastructural, and policy dimensions of secure federated generative AI systems deployed across heterogeneous clinical environments. We propose a multi-tiered framework that integrates differential privacy, homomorphic encryption, and decentralized consensus mechanisms to protect patient data while preserving model fidelity. The discussion emphasizes structural trade-offs between diagnostic accuracy, communication efficiency, and privacy guarantees, noting that aggressive privacy budgets often degrade generative output quality. Governance considerations are addressed through the lens of data sovereignty, algorithmic fairness, and accountability across jurisdictions, with particular attention to the disparities in imaging data representation across demographic groups. Deployment strategies are evaluated with respect to bandwidth constraints, edge device heterogeneity, and the carbon footprint of large-scale generative model training. Sustainability challenges are explored through the lens of model compression, continual learning, and energy-aware scheduling. Ethical implications, including the risk of synthetic image misuse and diagnostic over-reliance, are critically assessed. The paper concludes with a forward-looking research agenda that calls for standardized audit protocols, interoperable security primitives, and inclusive policy frameworks that balance innovation with patient safety.
References
1. McMahan, B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., & y Arcas, B. A. (2017). Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 54, 1273-1282.
2. Hardy, C., Le Merrer, E., & Sericola, B. (2019). MD-GAN: Multi-discriminator generative adversarial networks for distributed datasets. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, 260-269.
3. Zhu, L., Liu, Z., & Han, S. (2019). Deep leakage from gradients. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32, 14774-14784.
4. Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019). Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science, 366(6464), 447-453.
5. Bonawitz, K., Ivanov, V., Kreuter, B., Marcedone, A., McMahan, H. B., Patel, S., Ramage, D., Segal, A., & Seth, K. (2017). Practical secure aggregation for privacy-preserving machine learning. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 1175-1191.
6. Tramer, F., & Boneh, D. (2019). Slalom: Fast, verifiable and private execution of neural networks in trusted hardware. Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 237-252.
7. Blanchard, P., El Mhamdi, E. M., Guerraoui, R., & Stainer, J. (2017). Machine learning with adversaries: Byzantine tolerant gradient descent. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 119-129.
8. Wang, S., Tuor, T., Salonidis, T., Leung, K. K., Makaya, C., He, T., & Chan, K. (2019). Adaptive federated learning in resource constrained edge computing systems. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 37(6), 1205-1221.
9. Abadi, M., Chu, A., Goodfellow, I., McMahan, H. B., Mironov, I., Talwar, K., & Zhang, L. (2016). Deep learning with differential privacy. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 308-318.
10. Dwork, C., & Roth, A. (2014). The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy. Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science, 9(3-4), 211-407.
11. Wang, Z., Song, M., Zhang, Z., Song, Y., Wang, Q., & Qi, H. (2020). Beyond inferring class representatives: User-level privacy leakage from federated learning. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, 2512-2520.
12. Lu, Y., Huang, X., Dai, Y., Maharjan, S., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Blockchain and federated learning for privacy-preserved data sharing in industrial IoT. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 16(6), 4177-4186.
13. Du, W., Xu, D., Wu, X., & Tong, H. (2021). Fairness-aware federated learning. Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 296-306.
14. Bzdok, D., & Meyer-Lindenberg, A. (2022). Machine learning for precision psychiatry: Opportunities and challenges. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, 7(4), 359-367.
15. Humbert, M., Trubert, B., & Huguenin, K. (2019). A survey on data cooperatives for collaborative machine learning. Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 45-54.
16. Li, T., Sahu, A. K., Talwalkar, A., & Smith, V. (2020). Federated learning: Challenges, methods, and future directions. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 37(3), 50-60.
17. Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019). Energy and policy considerations for deep learning in NLP. Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 3645-3650.
18. Kirkpatrick, J., Pascanu, R., Rabinowitz, N., Veness, J., Desjardins, G., Rusu, A. A., Milan, K., Quan, J., Ramalho, T., Grabska-Barwinska, A., Hassabis, D., Clopath, C., Kumaran, D., & Hinton, G. (2017). Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(13), 3521-3526.
19. Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., Bernstein, M. S., Bohg, J., Bosselut, A., Brunskill, E., Brynjolfsson, E., Buch, S., Card, D., Castellon, R., Chatterji, N., Chen, A., Creel, K., Davis, J. Q., Demszky, D., ... Liang, P. (2021). On the opportunities and risks of foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07258.
20. Poursabzi-Sangdeh, F., Goldstein, D. G., Hofman, J. M., Wortman Vaughan, J., & Wallach, H. (2021). Manipulating and measuring model interpretability. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-14.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Data Intelligence and AI Systems
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
