Physics-Informed Deep Learning for Dynamic Model Updating of Smart Viscoelastic Composite Structures

Authors

  • George L. Hahes School of Computing, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA. Author

Keywords:

physics-informed deep learning, model updating, viscoelastic composites, structural health monitoring, digital twin, smart infrastructure

Abstract

The integration of viscoelastic damping layers into smart composite structures is increasingly deployed in large-scale civil, aerospace, and mechanical infrastructures to mitigate vibration and enhance operational safety. The accurate dynamic characterization of these structures demands model updating procedures that can reconcile time-evolving sensor data with physical governing laws, especially as material degradation, temperature effects, and nonlinear damping phenomena introduce systematic deviations from baseline finite element representations. Physics-informed deep learning offers a unified framework that embeds known constitutive and equilibrium constraints directly into neural network training, enabling dynamic model updating without relying on purely data-driven correlations. This paper presents a system-level examination of physics-informed deep learning architectures for dynamic model updating of smart viscoelastic composite structures, focusing on architectural trade-offs, computational scalability, governance, and deployment across heterogeneous sensing networks. Through an interdisciplinary lens that bridges structural mechanics, artificial intelligence, and infrastructure policy, the discussion evaluates how physics-informed loss formulations, distributed sensor integration, and federated learning protocols can transform model updating into a continuous, trustworthy digital twin service. Emphasis is placed on structural resilience against adversarial sensor noise, fairness in risk-aware decision-making, sustainability of embedded computing resources, and the policy frameworks required to certify physics-informed digital twins for safety-critical applications. The analysis reveals that the principal challenges reside not in algorithmic innovation alone but in designing institutional, contractual, and computational architectures that ensure long-term robustness, data provenance, and equitable access to model updating capabilities across public infrastructure portfolios.

References

1. Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2019). Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 378, 686-707.

2. Friswell, M. I., & Mottershead, J. E. (1995). Finite element model updating in structural dynamics. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

3. Baz, A. (1998). Robust control of active constrained layer damping. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 211(3), 467-485.

4. Sohn, H., Farrar, C. R., Hemez, F. M., Shunk, D. D., Stinemates, D. W., Nadler, B. R., & Czarnecki, J. J. (2003). A review of structural health monitoring literature: 1996–2001. Los Alamos National Laboratory Report, LA-13976-MS.

5. Worden, K., & Dulieu-Barton, J. M. (2004). An overview of intelligent fault detection in systems and structures. Structural Health Monitoring, 3(1), 85-98.

6. Farrar, C. R., & Worden, K. (2013). Structural health monitoring: A machine learning perspective. John Wiley & Sons.

7. Yang, Y., Nagarajaiah, S., & Ni, Y. Q. (2021). Data-driven structural health monitoring: A review. Structural Health Monitoring, 20(4), 2121-2156.

8. Tuegel, E. J., Ingraffea, A. R., Eason, T. G., & Spottswood, S. M. (2011). Reengineering aircraft structural life prediction using a digital twin. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2011, 154798.

9. Kapteyn, M. G., Pretorius, J. V. R., & Willcox, K. E. (2021). A probabilistic graphical model foundation for enabling predictive digital twins at scale. Nature Computational Science, 1(5), 337-347.

10. Sun, L., Shang, Z., Xia, Y., Bhowmick, S., & Nagarajaiah, S. (2020). Review of bridge structural health monitoring aided by big data and artificial intelligence: From condition assessment to damage detection. Journal of Structural Engineering, 146(5), 04020073.

11. Bhardwaj, A., Kim, D., & Koziel, S. (2022). Deep learning for structural health monitoring: A comprehensive review. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 29, 3073-3127.

12. Park, G., Rosing, T., Todd, M. D., Farrar, C. R., & Hodgkiss, W. (2008). Energy harvesting for structural health monitoring sensor networks. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 14(1), 64-79.

13. Christensen, R. M. (1982). Theory of viscoelasticity: An introduction. Academic Press.

14. Lakes, R. S. (1998). Viscoelastic solids. CRC Press.

15. Lu, J., Zhan, Z., Liu, X., & Wang, P. (2018). Numerical modeling and model updating for smart laminated structures with viscoelastic damping. Smart Materials and Structures, 27(7), 075038.

16. Azimi, M., Eslamlou, A. D., & Pekcan, G. (2020). Data-driven structural health monitoring and damage detection through deep learning: State-of-the-art review. Sensors, 20(10), 2778.

17. Ritto, T. G., & Rochinha, F. A. (2021). Uncertainty quantification in structural health monitoring using physics-informed neural networks. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 160, 107842.

18. Rasheed, A., San, O., & Kvamsdal, T. (2020). Digital twin: Values, challenges and an enabler from a physics-based modeling perspective. IEEE Access, 8, 21980-22012.

19. Yuan, F. G., Zargar, S. A., Chen, Q., & Wang, S. (2020). Machine learning for structural health monitoring: Challenges and opportunities. Proceedings of SPIE, 11379, 1137903.

20. Neves, A. C., González, I., Leal, R. P., & Karimi, H. R. (2020). A review of vibration-based damage detection in civil structures: From traditional methods to machine learning applications. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 147, 107077.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-17

How to Cite

Physics-Informed Deep Learning for Dynamic Model Updating of Smart Viscoelastic Composite Structures. (2026). Journal of Data Intelligence and AI Systems, 1(1). https://www.jdataai.org/index.php/home/article/view/79