Graph-Augmented Motion Encoding for Long-Term Human–Object Interaction Prediction in Egocentric Videos

Authors

  • Troy Dawson Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA. Author
  • Abhay Butta School of Computing, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA. Author
  • Asarc Ray School of Information Technology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA. Author
  • Nitin Menon Department of Computer Science, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA. Author

Keywords:

egocentric video, human–object interaction, graph neural networks, motion encoding, long-term prediction, spatiotemporal reasoning, system architecture

Abstract

Predicting human–object interactions from egocentric video over extended time horizons is a central challenge for assistive technologies, autonomous agents, and mixed-reality interfaces. This paper presents a graph-augmented motion encoding framework that addresses the limitations of existing temporal models by explicitly representing both spatial relationships and long-range motion dynamics within a structured graph topology. The proposed architecture integrates spatiotemporal feature extraction with a layered graph neural network that encodes interactions across objects, body parts, and scene elements over hundreds of frames. Unlike recurrent or transformer-based approaches that rely on sequential aggregation without explicit relational reasoning, the graph-augmented design captures compositional changes in motion patterns and allows the model to reason about partial occlusions and variable interaction durations. We analyze system-level trade-offs including graph sparsity versus computational overhead, temporal window selection, and generalization across diverse egocentric datasets. Deployment considerations for real-time inference on edge devices, sustainability of large-scale training, and fairness in interaction recognition across demographic and activity distributions are discussed. The framework demonstrates robust performance in long-horizon prediction benchmarks while maintaining interpretability through graph topology analysis. Policy implications for privacy-conscious egocentric data collection and annotation standards are also examined. This work contributes a structural perspective on motion encoding that bridges graph learning and temporal modeling for complex socio-technical systems.

References

1. Gkioxari, G., Girshick, R., Dollar, P., & He, K. (2018). Detecting and recognizing human-object interactions. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 8359–8367).

2. Miech, A., Zhukov, D., Alayrac, J.-B., Tapaswi, M., Laptev, I., & Sivic, J. (2019). HowTo100M: Learning a text-video embedding by watching hundred million narrated video clips. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 2630–2640).

3. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., ... & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 5998–6008).

4. Arnab, A., Dehghani, M., Heigold, G., Sun, C., Lučić, M., & Schmid, C. (2021). ViViT: A video vision transformer. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 6836–6846).

5. Tran, D., Bourdev, L., Fergus, R., Torresani, L., & Paluri, M. (2015). Learning spatiotemporal features with 3D convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 4489–4497).

6. Qi, S., Wang, W., Jia, B., Shen, J., & Zhu, S.-C. (2018). Learning human-object interactions by graph parsing neural networks. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 401–417).

7. Jain, A., Zamir, A. R., Savarese, S., & Saxena, A. (2016). Structural-RNN: Deep learning on spatio-temporal graphs. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 5308–5317).

8. Bertasius, G., Wang, H., & Torresani, L. (2021). Is space-time attention all you need for video understanding? In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 813–823).

9. Kipf, T. N., & Welling, M. (2017). Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations.

10. Li, J., Ma, H., & Tomizuka, M. (2020). Interaction-aware motion prediction for autonomous vehicles with graph neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (pp. 11091–11097).

11. Hamilton, W. L., Ying, Z., & Leskovec, J. (2017). Inductive representation learning on large graphs. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 1024–1034).

12. Shi, X., Bai, Z., & Wang, Z. (2020). Convolutional LSTM network: A machine learning approach for precipitation nowcasting. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 802–810).

13. Jin, Haopeng, et al. "HY-Himmel Technical Report: Hierarchical Interleaved Multi-stream Motion Encoding for Long Video Understanding." arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.08158 (2026).

14. Alayrac, J.-B., Recasens, A., Schneider, R., Arandjelović, R., Ramapuram, J., De Fauw, J., ... & Zisserman, A. (2020). Self-supervised multimodal versatile networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 25–37).

15. Damen, D., Doughty, H., Farinella, G. M., Fidler, S., Furnari, A., Kazakos, E., ... & Bailey, D. (2018). Scaling egocentric vision: The EPIC-Kitchens dataset. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 720–736).

16. Li, Y., Lu, Z., Wang, C., & Jia, J. (2021). Ego4D: Around 3000 hours of egocentric video. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 18931–18941).

17. Zhu, P., Han, F., & Deng, H. (2023, December). Flexible multi-generator model with fused spatiotemporal graph for trajectory prediction. In IET Conference Proceedings CP874 (Vol. 2023, No. 47, pp. 417-422). Stevenage, UK: The Institution of Engineering and Technology.

18. Grauman, K., Westbury, A., Byrne, E., Chavis, Z., Damen, D., Davison, A., ... & Zhang, Q. (2022). Ego4D: Around the world in 3,000 hours of egocentric video. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 18995–19005).

19. Cheng, Y., Wang, Q., & Lu, H. (2022). Graph-based interaction reasoning for long-term video prediction. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 672–680).

20. Wang, Y., Gupta, A., & Hebert, M. (2020). Learning to learn how to learn: Self-adaptive visual navigation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 11100–11109).

21. Gu, J., Wang, Z., Kuen, J., Ma, L., Shahroudy, A., Shuai, B., ... & Liu, T. (2018). Recent advances in convolutional neural networks. Pattern Recognition, 77, 354–377.

22. Kumar, A., Ma, Z., & Liang, P. (2020). Structuring interactions in egocentric video via graph neural networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-13

How to Cite

Graph-Augmented Motion Encoding for Long-Term Human–Object Interaction Prediction in Egocentric Videos. (2026). Journal of Data Intelligence and AI Systems, 1(1). https://www.jdataai.org/index.php/home/article/view/40