Cross-Layer Co-Optimization of Hollow-Core Fiber Links and Distributed Computing Workloads in AI Data Centers
Keywords:
hollow-core fiber, AI data centers, cross-layer optimization, distributed computing, optical interconnects, sustainability, governanceAbstract
Artificial intelligence data centers are becoming tightly coupled socio-technical infrastructures in which computational intensity, communication latency, energy use, and governance obligations intersect. This paper examines cross-layer co-optimization of hollow-core fiber links and distributed computing workloads in AI data centers. The central argument is that hollow-core fiber is not merely a faster physical medium; it is an architectural perturbation that can reshape topology, scheduling, synchronization, failure recovery, and sustainability decisions across the data center stack. Distributed AI workloads, including large-model training, mixture-of-experts inference, and disaggregated serving, generate bursty, low-latency-sensitive, and often collective communication patterns that challenge conventional layered design. By reducing propagation delay and nonlinear impairment, hollow-core fiber creates opportunities for flatter topologies, tighter clock synchronization, optical circuit and wavelength switching, and more aggressive workload placement. However, these benefits depend on manufacturing maturity, splicing and connector ecosystems, cost structures, repair models, and carbon accounting. The paper develops a system-level framework for cross-layer co-optimization that integrates physical-layer properties, network architecture, workload scheduling, tenant fairness, resilience, and policy. It also considers governance implications for resource allocation, carbon transparency, and equitable access. The analysis suggests that AI data centers should treat hollow-core fiber as part of a coupled design space rather than as a drop-in replacement for standard single-mode fiber. Sustainable and robust deployment will require joint optimization of optical infrastructure, workload orchestration, and institutional rules that align efficiency, fairness, and accountability.
References
1. Barroso, L. A., Hölzle, U., & Ranganathan, P. (2018). The datacenter as a computer: Designing warehouse-scale machines (3rd ed.). Morgan & Claypool.
2. Dean, J., & Barroso, L. A. (2013). The tail at scale. Communications of the ACM, 56(2), 74-80.
3. Jouppi, N. P., Young, C., Patil, N., Patterson, D., Agrawal, G., Bajwa, R., Bates, S., Bhatia, S., Boden, N., Borchers, A., Boyle, R., Cantin, P., Chao, C., Clark, C., Coriell, J., Daley, M., Dau, M., Dean, J., Gelb, B., ... Yoon, D. H. (2017). In-datacenter performance analysis of a tensor processing unit. In Proceedings of the 44th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (pp. 1-12). Association for Computing Machinery.
4. Shalf, J. (2020). The future of computing beyond Moore's Law. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 378(2166), 20190061.
5. Masanet, E., Shehabi, A., Lei, N., Smith, S., & Koomey, J. (2020). Recalibrating global data center energy-use estimates. Science, 367(6481), 984-986.
6. Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019). Energy and policy considerations for deep learning in NLP. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 3645-3650). Association for Computational Linguistics.
7. Patterson, D., Gonzalez, J., Le, Q., Liang, C., Munguia, L.-M., Rothchild, D., So, D., Texier, M., & Dean, J. (2021). Carbon emissions and large neural network training. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.10350
8. Greenberg, A., Hamilton, J., Maltz, D. A., & Patel, P. (2008). The cost of a cloud: Research problems in data center networks. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 39(1), 68-73.
9. Al-Fares, M., Loukissas, A., & Vahdat, A. (2008). A scalable, commodity data center network architecture. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2008 Conference on Data Communication (pp. 63-74). Association for Computing Machinery.
10. Zhou, Zichuan, et al. "Low-latency wavelength-switched clock-synchronized intra-data center interconnects enabled by hollow core fiber." Optics Express 31.15 (2023): 24739-24748.
11. Kachris, C., & Tomkos, I. (2012). A survey on optical interconnects for data centers. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 14(4), 1021-1036.
12. Cheng, Q., Bahadori, M., Glick, M., Rumley, S., & Bergman, K. (2018). Recent advances in optical technologies for data centers: A review. Optica, 5(11), 1354-1370.
13. Bogaerts, W., De Heyn, P., Van Vaerenbergh, T., De Vos, K., Kumar Selvaraja, S., Claes, T., Dumon, P., Bienstman, P., Van Thourhout, D., & Baets, R. (2012). Silicon microring resonators. Laser & Photonics Reviews, 6(1), 47-73.
14. Poletti, F., Wheeler, N. V., Petrovich, M. N., Baddela, N., Fokoua, E. N., Hayes, J. R., Gray, D. R., Li, Z., Slavík, R., Jung, Y., Mangan, B. J., & Richardson, D. J. (2013). Towards high-capacity fibre-optic communications at the speed of light in vacuum. Nature Photonics, 7(4), 279-284.
15. Richardson, D. J., Fini, J. M., & Nelson, L. E. (2013). Space-division multiplexing in optical fibres. Nature Photonics, 7(5), 354-362.
16. Abts, D., & Kim, J. (2011). High performance datacenter networks: Architectures, algorithms, and opportunities. Morgan & Claypool.
17. Buyya, R., Yeo, C. S., Venugopal, S., Broberg, J., & Brandic, I. (2009). Cloud computing and emerging IT platforms: Vision, hype, and reality for delivering computing as the 5th utility. Future Generation Computer Systems, 25(6), 599-616.
18. Heller, B., Seetharaman, S., Mahadevan, P., Yiakoumis, Y., Sharma, P., Banerjee, S., & McKeown, N. (2010). ElasticTree: Saving energy in data center networks. In Proceedings of the 7th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (pp. 249-264). USENIX Association.
19. Vahdat, A., Al-Fares, M., Farrington, N., Mysore, R. N., Porter, G., & Radhakrishnan, S. (2010). Scale-out networking in the data center. IEEE Micro, 30(4), 29-41.
20. Kandula, S., Sengupta, S., Greenberg, A., Patel, P., & Chaiken, R. (2009). The nature of data center traffic: Measurements and analysis. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement (pp. 202-208). Association for Computing Machinery.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Data Intelligence and AI Systems

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.