Intelligent Social Robots for Facilitating Creative Interaction and Emotional Well-Being
Keywords:
social robotics; human-robot interaction; affective computing; creative interaction; emotional well-being; system governanceAbstract
Intelligent social robots are increasingly positioned at the intersection of creative practice and emotional care. This article examines these systems as socio-technical infrastructures rather than isolated devices. The central challenge is not merely improving a single algorithm or expressive mechanism but managing structural trade-offs among autonomy, interpretability, personalization, privacy, and long-term sustainability. Drawing on human-robot interaction, affective computing, creativity research, and artificial intelligence governance, the article develops a system-level perspective on robot architectures that integrate perception, affective modeling, creative behavior generation, and therapeutic interaction. It analyzes how social robots can structure open-ended creative tasks such as storytelling, improvisation, and music making while preserving user agency and emotional safety. The discussion addresses architecture, interaction dynamics, deployment in healthcare and education, infrastructure requirements, fairness, robustness, and policy. It shows that creative interaction robots operate under deep uncertainty because emotional responses, aesthetic preferences, and social norms vary across contexts. Consequently, design must balance predictable clinical benefits with the open-ended contingencies of creative exchange. The article concludes that sustainable deployment requires governance frameworks that connect technical validation, stakeholder participation, and ongoing audit of socio-emotional outcomes. Future systems should be evaluated not only for task success but also for their capacity to support autonomy, relatedness, competence, and long-term emotional flourishing.
References
1. Breazeal, C. (2003). Toward sociable robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3-4), 167-175.
2. Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., & Dautenhahn, K. (2003). A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3-4), 143-166.
3. Dautenhahn, K. (2007). Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human-robot interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 362(1480), 679-704.
4. Goodrich, M. A., & Schultz, A. C. (2007). Human-robot interaction: a survey. Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction, 1(3), 203-275.
5. Feil-Seifer, D., & Matarić, M. J. (2005). Defining socially assistive robotics. 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 465-468.
6. Picard, R. W. (1997). Affective computing. MIT Press.
7. Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books.
8. Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books.
9. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row.
10. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
11. Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Free Press.
12. Asada, M., Hosoda, K., Kuniyoshi, Y., Ishiguro, H., Inui, T., Yoshikawa, Y., ... & Yoshida, C. (2009). Cognitive developmental robotics: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development, 1(1), 12-34.
13. Belpaeme, T., Kennedy, J., Ramachandran, A., Scassellati, B., & Tanaka, F. (2018). Social robots for education: A review. Science Robotics, 3(21), eaat5954.
14. Scassellati, B., Admoni, H., & Matarić, M. (2012). Robots for use in autism research. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 14, 275-294.
15. Broadbent, E., Stafford, R., & MacDonald, B. (2009). Acceptance of healthcare robots for the older population: Review and future directions. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(4), 319-330.
16. Kachouie, R., Sedighadeli, S., Khosla, R., & Chu, M. T. (2014). Socially assistive robots in elderly care: A mixed-method systematic literature review. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 30(5), 369-393.
17. Wada, K., & Shibata, T. (2007). Living with seal robots: Its sociopsychological and physiological influences on the elderly at a care house. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 23(5), 972-980.
18. Wang, Z., Ma, L., Jin, Y., Feng, Y., Pan, X., Ji, S., & Zhang, K. (2025, August). AI-assisted human-pet artistic musical co-creation for wellness therapy. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 10216-10224).
19. Hancock, P. A., Billings, D. R., Schaefer, K. E., Chen, J. Y. C., de Visser, E. J., & Parasuraman, R. (2011). A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Human Factors, 53(5), 517-527.
20. Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., ... & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689-707.
21. Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389-399.
22. Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 1-35.
23. Minsky, M. (2006). The emotion machine: Commonsense thinking, artificial intelligence, and the future of the human mind. Simon & Schuster.
24. Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (1999). Handbook of creativity. Cambridge University Press.
25. Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist's view of psychotherapy. Houghton Mifflin.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Data Intelligence and AI Systems

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.