Generative AI-Enhanced Demand Forecasting and Capacity Sharing in Resilient Manufacturing Systems

Authors

  • Walid R. Hunt Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, USA. Author
  • Pankaj Pillai School of Information Technology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA. Author
  • Rivan Cawe Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA. Author
  • Mertin Gragery Department of Computer Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA. Author

Keywords:

generative artificial intelligence, demand forecasting, capacity sharing, resilient manufacturing systems, socio-technical infrastructure, supply chain governance

Abstract

The increasing turbulence in global supply networks, driven by geopolitical tensions, climate-related disruptions, and volatile demand patterns, has elevated resilience to a strategic imperative in manufacturing systems. At the same time, recent advances in generative artificial intelligence have opened fundamentally new possibilities for demand forecasting by synthesizing complex, multimodal information and generating probabilistic scenarios rather than deterministic point estimates. When coupled with emerging architectures for capacity sharing among independent firms, these capabilities can transform how manufacturing networks absorb shocks, reallocate resources, and maintain continuity. This paper presents a system-level analysis of the integration of generative AI-enhanced demand forecasting with reciprocal capacity sharing mechanisms, emphasizing structural trade-offs, architectural choices, and governance frameworks. It examines how large-scale generative models can capture latent demand structure across heterogeneous data sources and produce forecast ensembles that support contingent capacity pooling contracts. The discussion addresses the interdependencies between forecasting accuracy, information asymmetry, trust formation, incentive alignment, and the overall resilience of manufacturing ecosystems. Further, the paper explores infrastructure requirements for data exchange, model deployment, and real-time orchestration of shared capacity, as well as the fairness, sustainability, and policy dimensions that arise when algorithmic coordination governs distributed production resources. By avoiding narrow technical formalization and instead focusing on the socio-technical fabric that binds intelligent forecasting with cooperative resource management, the analysis contributes a holistic perspective on designing resilient manufacturing systems for an era of deep uncertainty.

References

1. Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2004). Building the resilient supply chain. International Journal of Logistics Management, 15(2), 1-13.

2. Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2020). Viability of intertwined supply networks: Extending the supply chain resilience angles towards survivability. International Journal of Production Research, 58(10), 2904-2915.

3. Carbonneau, R., Laframboise, K., & Vahidov, R. (2008). Application of machine learning techniques for supply chain demand forecasting. European Journal of Operational Research, 184(3), 1140-1154.

4. Wu, Y., Tan, H., Dong, L., & Zhu, J. (2020). Time series forecasting with generative adversarial networks. IEEE Access, 8, 186772-186781.

5. Pettit, T. J., Fiksel, J., & Croxton, K. L. (2010). Ensuring supply chain resilience: Development of a conceptual framework. Journal of Business Logistics, 31(1), 1-21.

6. Anupindi, R., Bassok, Y., & Zemel, E. (2001). A general framework for the study of decentralized distribution systems. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 3(4), 349-368.

7. Hu, X., & Caldentey, R. (2023). Trust and reciprocity in firms’ capacity sharing. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 25(4), 1436-1450.

8. Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389-399.

9. Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 2053951716679679.

10. Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1

11. Wynsberghe, A. van. (2021). Sustainable AI: AI for sustainability and the sustainability of AI. AI and Ethics, 1(3), 213-218.

12. Baryannis, G., Validi, S., Dani, S., & Antoniou, G. (2019). Supply chain risk management and artificial intelligence: State of the art and future research directions. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2179-2202.

13. Dolgui, A., Ivanov, D., & Sokolov, B. (2018). Ripple effect in the supply chain: An analysis and recent literature. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1-2), 414-430.

14. Sheffi, Y., & Rice Jr, J. B. (2005). A supply chain view of the resilient enterprise. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(1), 41-48.

15. Klibi, W., Martel, A., & Guitouni, A. (2010). The design of robust value-creating supply chain networks: A critical review. European Journal of Operational Research, 203(2), 283-293.

16. Ivanov, D. (2021). Lean resilience: AURA (Active Usage of Resilience Assets) framework for post-COVID-19 supply chain management. International Journal of Logistics Management, 33(4), 1196-1217.

17. Tang, C. S. (2006). Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 9(1), 33-45.

18. Choi, T. M., & Luo, S. (2019). Data quality challenges for sustainable fashion supply chain operations in emerging markets: Roles of blockchain, government, and environment. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 131, 139-152.

19. Wang, G., Gunasekaran, A., Ngai, E. W., & Papadopoulos, T. (2016). Big data analytics in logistics and supply chain management: Certain investigations for research and applications. International Journal of Production Economics, 176, 98-110.

20. Hofmann, E., & Rüsch, M. (2017). Industry 4.0 and the current status as well as future prospects on logistics. Computers in Industry, 89, 23-34.

21. Fatorachian, H., & Kazemi, H. (2021). Impact of Industry 4.0 on supply chain performance. Production Planning & Control, 32(1), 63-81.

22. Ghadge, A., Er Kara, M., Moradlou, H., & Goswami, M. (2020). The impact of Industry 4.0 implementation on supply chains. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 31(4), 669-686.

23. Wamba, S. F., & Queiroz, M. M. (2020). Blockchain in the operations and supply chain management: Benefits, challenges and future research directions. International Journal of Information Management, 52, 102064.

24. Kusiak, A. (2018). Smart manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1-2), 508-517.

25. Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2021). A digital supply chain twin for managing the disruption risks and resilience in the era of Industry 4.0. Production Planning & Control, 32(9), 775-788.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-19

How to Cite

Generative AI-Enhanced Demand Forecasting and Capacity Sharing in Resilient Manufacturing Systems. (2026). Journal of Data Intelligence and AI Systems, 1(3). https://www.jdataai.org/index.php/home/article/view/124